Our womens clothing store
If you are about to read this article you may notice that this article isn't worth reading. This womens clothing page has a sole purpose of bringing women to this store.
In my opinion, it is useful for there to be a category for each clothing range so that I cater for the all woman and for this category. I have named this one Womens clothing store so that these women can easily find what they are looking for.
However, I do think that it is a slightly mad to have different terms for each section, as ‘Womens clothing store’ implies ‘womens clothing shop’ which is the same thing but ultimately its about women looking for clothes, they have been distinctly categorised as being different because of the inability of computers determining the difference between the two. The average woman can easily see that the two terms mean the same thing, it's a human thing. I do wonder if it will be possible in the future that they will be able to work out the differences.
I think it would be a better idea if clothes or clothing could be made equal in their logic.
Here is an article i thought was worth publishing in here for ladies, this was not written by us and we do not take any responsibility for what follows.
Is a "plus size range" politically correct?
In my opinion, it is useful for there to be a category of ladies clothing ranges that cater for the larger woman, and for this category to have a universal name so that these larger women can easily deduce whether a brand sells clothes that are targeted for them.
However, I do think that ‘plus size’ is a slightly derogatory term, as ‘plus’ implies ‘excess’ which may make women feel that if they wear plus size clothes, they have been distinctly categorised as being larger than the average woman, and larger than is normal. I do believe that it is possible to be a size 16 woman and still be well proportioned and healthy.
I think it would be a better idea if clothes were sold with the angle of flattering different shaped bodies, rather than selling to the ‘normal’ women, and selling to the ‘plus size’ women. For example, jeans labels could say ‘For those of us with unforgiving thighs, these wide cut jeans are beautifully flattering.’ Other cuts of other items could focus on helping women reduce the appearance of ‘belly fat’, a large bum, wide ankles, broad shoulders etc. This approach is similar to the recent Dove campaign, and instead of alienating women who are not perfect, encourages them to joke about their imperfections and shows them how to look their best and be confident with who they are.
I do, however, also think it’s important not to get carried away and ignore the problem of obesity that is becoming prevalent in our society. However, I believe that in our current society it is not the problem of the clothes manufacturers to tackle this problem and that obese women should be allowed to enjoy women’s fashion just as much as their smaller counterparts.
The last point made about larger sizes and why they are so much harder to find.
Women of a larger frame tend to not buy the quantity that smaller women buy. If the market place could support equal amounts lady for lady then manufacturers would produce them, but it has been done so many times and never took off.
Its all a question of supply and demand, if there was a large demand for plus size fashion it would be produced.
